- Messages
- 545
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 0
Analysing the data of which trap the winning dog came out of in the Finals is very interesting. :sweating:
The data shows that the inside trap produced 3 winners, the 2 trap produced 3 winners also and the other two traps had a single winner each. So it is possible to state that the inside traps favoured the winners.
When considering the runner-up positions, the inside trap produced 3 runners-up and the 2 trap only 1 runner-up. Three runners-up came from the 3 trap and only a single runner-up from the 4 trap. Showing a slight skew to the inside traps. :blink:
Now the question is should the inside traps which may offer an advantage to the runners be given to those who have won their semi-finals (as a benefit for winning the semi) or given to the runner-up from the semi-final – to even up the final? :wacko:
Or should the traps be drawn for to add randomness to the Championship Final?
The data shows that the inside trap produced 3 winners, the 2 trap produced 3 winners also and the other two traps had a single winner each. So it is possible to state that the inside traps favoured the winners.
When considering the runner-up positions, the inside trap produced 3 runners-up and the 2 trap only 1 runner-up. Three runners-up came from the 3 trap and only a single runner-up from the 4 trap. Showing a slight skew to the inside traps. :blink:
Now the question is should the inside traps which may offer an advantage to the runners be given to those who have won their semi-finals (as a benefit for winning the semi) or given to the runner-up from the semi-final – to even up the final? :wacko:
Or should the traps be drawn for to add randomness to the Championship Final?
