- Messages
- 487
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
A debate/discussion took place this morning on the radio.Simply put, more folk are supporting the hunt than before the Ban came into place.
Several callers , from CA to LACS to obvious Antis rang in and gave their views.
The radio host gave the opinion that after 700 hours of debate in the house of commons, all the elected members and New Labour knew the Ban would not work and he believed it was part of some "Spin" to distract from lack of success with rural issues.Transport, Health, Fuel, Education etc etc
Blair knew that the police would not be able to police the ban, so maybe a clever distraction ?
Also mentioned, foxes are still being pursued and caught using hounds but with the aid of using loopholes in the ban, ie Flushing to birds of prey as one example.Or flushed to be shot at.Or going off the scent of a drag hunt !!
The programme questioned these loopholes as a get out clause to keep hunters hunting, on the right side of the law.
Q.....................Is the Ban, a covert/overt spin, distraction ? will or can it be implemented.
Any views ?
Several callers , from CA to LACS to obvious Antis rang in and gave their views.
The radio host gave the opinion that after 700 hours of debate in the house of commons, all the elected members and New Labour knew the Ban would not work and he believed it was part of some "Spin" to distract from lack of success with rural issues.Transport, Health, Fuel, Education etc etc
Blair knew that the police would not be able to police the ban, so maybe a clever distraction ?
Also mentioned, foxes are still being pursued and caught using hounds but with the aid of using loopholes in the ban, ie Flushing to birds of prey as one example.Or flushed to be shot at.Or going off the scent of a drag hunt !!
The programme questioned these loopholes as a get out clause to keep hunters hunting, on the right side of the law.
Q.....................Is the Ban, a covert/overt spin, distraction ? will or can it be implemented.
Any views ?