An Apology.......lmao

[trac]

Join our free community today.

Connect with other like-minded dog lovers!

Login or Register

ApologyFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Search Wiktionary Look up apology in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

 

Apology may refer to:

 

* An expression of regret, roughly a dislike of one's own actions in the past

 

 

Thats what an apology is.......NOT to further insult people.

 

And how come all the trouble on K9 is suddenly down to

FAO........i amazed by all this.......its all pathetic............

To be honest Ann i wa surprised why FAO was brought into it

ok we are not innocent, we were sometimes out of order but we did not cause all of this what is going on k9,

we had people come into our thread calling us all sorts of names, they were then subsequently put on mod-preview only to open other accounts to come back and say more crap, and be down right nasty

why should we get the blame for it all,

when quite a few others their only intention is to incite trouble, or argue,

which if you look is in most forums on here,

we are not to blame for them

I'd be the first to agree the FAO thread and those who regularly posted therein are not the sole cause of K9s problems. However, it isn't your thread, it's public and those on the thread consitantly broke the rules. It isn't a case of a lone wolf mod being partisan as we are all in agreement as to the action taken.

Certain members prolific on that thread are known to be deliberatley inciting trouble across the board.

The problem of opening new accounts has been noted.

at the risk of being warned here ,can i ask where i broke the rules ?

I have no knowledge of you breaking the rules and I won't be going through the whole thread to prove whether you did or not. It's perhaps unfortunate for those who didn't break any rules that the thread was closed because of those that did. Are you suggesting no one broke the rules?

Anyone else who would like to know what rules they have broken perhaps ought to contact admin. Admin can then discuss it with the relevant mods who I'm confident has plenty of examples.

no im not saying that no one broke the rules ,but the way it was written made it look as if we all have

No indication that all broke the rules is given or implied.

sorry but the line those on the thread consitantly broke the rules. sounds like all of us

 

[Tony Taylor]

all that was required here was an apology for your remarks..cant you just do that and mean it? to all the people who you offended just say sorry..not that difficult eh?

Be specific as to the remarks you feel need apologising for. I've already explained the post.

 

[Painted Lady]

Definition of "clique" .......... A small exclusive group of friends or associates. intr.v. cliqued, cliqu·ing, cliques Informal. To form, associate in, or act as a clique.

K9 Rule - to be found under Rules and Disclaimer/The Guidelines

* You must not make personal attacks on other groups, persons, organisations or users. If you feel you must criticise then criticise the idea not the individual or group. Any posts criticising individuals or groups will probably get removed and those doing the critcising will be warned via the warning system.

It's not rocket science!!!!

If you call a clique hypocritical and stupid I would suggest that you are insulting that group which is in contravention of the K9 rules!!!

 

[Tony Taylor]

ApologyFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Search Wiktionary Look up apology in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

 

Apology may refer to:

 

* An expression of regret, roughly a dislike of one's own actions in the past

 

 

Thats what an apology is.......NOT to further insult people.

 

And how come all the trouble on K9 is suddenly down to

FAO........i amazed by all this.......its all pathetic............

To be honest Ann i wa surprised why FAO was brought into it

ok we are not innocent, we were sometimes out of order but we did not cause all of this what is going on k9,

we had people come into our thread calling us all sorts of names, they were then subsequently put on mod-preview only to open other accounts to come back and say more crap, and be down right nasty

why should we get the blame for it all,

when quite a few others their only intention is to incite trouble, or argue,

which if you look is in most forums on here,

we are not to blame for them

I'd be the first to agree the FAO thread and those who regularly posted therein are not the sole cause of K9s problems. However, it isn't your thread, it's public and those on the thread consitantly broke the rules. It isn't a case of a lone wolf mod being partisan as we are all in agreement as to the action taken.

Certain members prolific on that thread are known to be deliberatley inciting trouble across the board.

The problem of opening new accounts has been noted.

at the risk of being warned here ,can i ask where i broke the rules ?

I have no knowledge of you breaking the rules and I won't be going through the whole thread to prove whether you did or not. It's perhaps unfortunate for those who didn't break any rules that the thread was closed because of those that did. Are you suggesting no one broke the rules?

Anyone else who would like to know what rules they have broken perhaps ought to contact admin. Admin can then discuss it with the relevant mods who I'm confident has plenty of examples.

no im not saying that no one broke the rules ,but the way it was written made it look as if we all have

No indication that all broke the rules is given or implied.

sorry but the line those on the thread consitantly broke the rules. sounds like all of us

It doesn't mean all though;

for clarity: some of those on the thread consistantly broke the rules.

 

[Tony Taylor]

Definition of "clique" .......... A small exclusive group of friends or associates. intr.v. cliqued, cliqu·ing, cliques Informal. To form, associate in, or act as a clique.
K9 Rule - to be found under Rules and Disclaimer/The Guidelines

* You must not make personal attacks on other groups, persons, organisations or users. If you feel you must criticise then criticise the idea not the individual or group. Any posts criticising individuals or groups will probably get removed and those doing the critcising will be warned via the warning system.

It's not rocket science!!!!

If you call a clique hypocritical and stupid I would suggest that you are insulting that group which is in contravention of the K9 rules!!!

Perhaps you ought to take it up with Admin.

 

[Painted Lady]

see...a simple heart felt sorry would have stopped this days ago

 

[John Marsden]

I think arguing with a mod is breaking rules !

 

[trac]

I think arguing with a mod is breaking rules !

well im sure if we have we will be :thumbsup:

 

[Painted Lady]

dont think i am arguing..just defending myself and friends after what Tony Taylor referred us lot to..all I felt that an apology was needed for the remarks he made

 

[Tony Taylor]

see...a simple heart felt sorry would have stopped this days ago

What is it you want me to be sorry for exactly.

 

[Tony Taylor]

I think arguing with a mod is breaking rules !

I'm not on this thread as a moderator per se.

 

[Tony Taylor]

Here for the next 8 mins.

 

[Painted Lady]

oh I give up!!! This is getting nowhere and I am bored of this now.....ask nigel about who you offended(cos i know there were complaints) and then you will know what the apology is for

 

[~Annie~]

I think arguing with a mod is breaking rules !

I think that begs the question ... when is a mod not a mod? Surely mods can sometimes post as themselves, without their moderating hat on as it were? In which case offering an alternative viewpoint to there's would surely be acceptable? I would have thought that a mods personal apology was one such case. Or maybe not :unsure:

 

[trac]

I think arguing with a mod is breaking rules !

I'm not on this thread as a moderator per se.

sorry you have lost me here

 

[Tony Taylor]

oh I give up!!! This is getting nowhere and I am bored of this now.....ask nigel about who you offended(cos i know there were complaints) and then you will know what the apology is for

Admin has dealt with this matter.

 

[Tony Taylor]

I think arguing with a mod is breaking rules !

I'm not on this thread as a moderator per se.

sorry you have lost me here

Any discussiion on this topic that isn't overtly offensive won't be moderated by me. I'm not in favour of censorship for personal gain.

 

[Tony Taylor]

I think arguing with a mod is breaking rules !

I think that begs the question ... when is a mod not a mod? Surely mods can sometimes post as themselves, without their moderating hat on as it were? In which case offering an alternative viewpoint to there's would surely be acceptable? I would have thought that a mods personal apology was one such case. Or maybe not :unsure:

Correct. see prevoius reply.

 

[trac]

I think arguing with a mod is breaking rules !

I'm not on this thread as a moderator per se.

sorry you have lost me here

Any discussiion on this topic that isn't overtly offensive won't be moderated by me. I'm not in favour of censorship for personal gain.

ok i appreciate that

 

[whatshappin]

like I said ask the Mods or yourself to put the offending post back on again and I am sure we will highlight the insult if there was nothing offensive on it repost it