BWRA Proposals 2004

[sophie2]

Join our free community today.

Connect with other like-minded dog lovers!

Login or Register

i am sure i have read on here somewhere that rowland has packed in racing and was not going to post on here again, but hence she still has opinions on the racing seen. not that it has anything to do with her.

 

[cinnamon]

This is not a bwra or fed site and as long as you are a member of k9 you can post and anyone can have an opinion wether they are members or not plenty of people had opinions about tony and vonn when all the carrry on was on and no one complained that they were not members of bwra or fed cause they were agreeing with what the complainers wanted, so there is nothing to stop rowland from posting they have not called anyone un like some.

donna

ps lets not start this again they get brought into everything.

 

[rowland]

No rowland it is not a personal attack on any of the committee. All racers want is a fair vote, If our reps had done there jobs right and explained some of the proposals to the members , then perhaps the proposals would make more sence.

maybe you should have worded your post a little better,[The one committee member we have left who has alway given 100 % ]this reads like a prosonal attact on the rest of the committee

now we can all see how something writen can be misinterpreted wrong and can be misleading to the reader,

the reps do a very good job, they were only given 14 days between the date proposals had to be returned to Doreen and the reps meeting, with the best will in the world its impossible to organize a members meeting in that time, and this is not new to this committee its always been the seem in pass years :b

 

[rowland]

i have just been informed that you tanyia have been put forward for a post on the committee is this not a personal attack on the committee member already doing this job,

and why have Tony and i not been blamed for this proposal, ( maybe you don't want to influence the vote in this proposal by bring our names into it ) :b :cheers:

 

[Honeybee]

Has anybondy thought this: Muriel is the only original long standing member of the "old" BWRA Committee and, therefore, it may be a case of "a new broom sweeps clean" - just a thought. Also, Muriel may have suggested that the proposal is put on the form thus making the position "vacant" should somebody else wish to take the Treasury post. Don't think this is anything personal against Muriel as she has always done a good job. :cheers: Maybe members are jumping to the wrong conclusion. :rant: