peter rimmer said:and for the record iam not mark brick so please refrain from calling me him
have you swallowed a dictionary mark ? or have you got a new typer for you ?
dad says there simply couldnt be 2 of you (w00t) (w00t)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
peter rimmer said:and for the record iam not mark brick so please refrain from calling me him
ok iam sorry again,i am sick of people sending me messages...........mark?????????? well iam not,anyway can you help me about the 2 dogs that run of at the lurcher show ground last yr the black one and the blue one an under and over cheers mark oops :thumbsup: peter only joking therejml said:hope this aint aimed at me cos i didnt say u was called markbrick?
Sorry cant remember the dogs names,but heard about a 3 dog race which involved a fawn bitchpeter rimmer said:ok iam sorry again,i am sick of people sending me messages...........mark?????????? well iam not,anyway can you help me about the 2 dogs that run of at the lurcher show ground last yr the black one and the blue one an under and over cheers mark oops :thumbsup: peter only joking therejml said:hope this aint aimed at me cos i didnt say u was called markbrick?
hi gabbitas31,i will put some photos up for you i think i know who you are?are you the lady with the 2 whippets,?????mine is a laguna whippet so iam told it is 18 inch tall,i saw you at the hurdles when the black rough dog won the same as won the racing as you asked which dog won before i will get a photo up so you will remember me it was a lovelly day and its ashame not more attended,i heard there is one at silim?????????soon same organisers i will definatly be theregabbitas31 said:Can you put some pictures of your whippet and doberman up for us to see, i was there at the show i might of seen you.!!!!!!! :- "
oh thats a shame i thought you was one of the main organisers,i would love a chat with you about whippets yours look lovelly, :thumbsup: :wub: :wub:gabbitas31 said:I won't be there, going some where else. :thumbsup:
sorry jml you have lost me,iam not mark and only asked a simple question about a race?but you say thinks which i dont understand,anyway take care and best of luck in the racingjml said:i havent sent you personal messages!! if it was aimed at me?
like you say i am not childish and backbiting :lol: uncanny that mark also likes to use those words too. its a shame he hasnt made an apperance lately cos hes making you look even more like ur him :b
he'd also be able to tell u all about you hard back picture book!!
peter rimmer said:sorry jml you have lost me,iam not mark and only asked a simple question about a race?but you say thinks which i dont understand,anyway take care and best of luck in the racingjml said:i havent sent you personal messages!! if it was aimed at me?
like you say i am not childish and backbiting :lol: uncanny that mark also likes to use those words too. its a shame he hasnt made an apperance lately cos hes making you look even more like ur him :b
he'd also be able to tell u all about you hard back picture book!!
Sorry to butt in, but i must add my comments to this. As a retired handwriting and language expert, used many times by the courts and the police, i have to say that your inflections in the construction of your sentances are identical to Markbricks. You try to hide it by using different words, but i have indefaticable proof that Markbrick and Peter Rimmer are one and the same. Little things, like the joining of i and am, to create iam, common to both site users. Also, look at the endings of the posts. They either end with no punctuation at all, or both users end with a comma after the penultimate word. This is what we in the buisiness call a literary fingerprint, exclusive to one person. It is usually a prouct of their education and regional upbringing, and manifests itself in spelling or grammatical errors. Markbrick and Peter Rimmer have all the same errors and traits. They are one and the same.peter rimmer said:and for the record iam not mark brick so please refrain from calling me him
well sorry wunwin you are wrong,now is this the 1st time you have been wrong usely when proven you sneek back into the woodwork for a while but you are wrong,iam not markbrickwunwin said:Sorry to butt in, but i must add my comments to this. As a retired handwriting and language expert, used many times by the courts and the police, i have to say that your inflections in the construction of your sentances are identical to Markbricks. You try to hide it by using different words, but i have indefaticable proof that Markbrick and Peter Rimmer are one and the same. Little things, like the joining of i and am, to create iam, common to both site users. Also, look at the endings of the posts. They either end with no punctuation at all, or both users end with a comma after the penultimate word. This is what we in the buisiness call a literary fingerprint, exclusive to one person. It is usually a prouct of their education and regional upbringing, and manifests itself in spelling or grammatical errors. Markbrick and Peter Rimmer have all the same errors and traits. They are one and the same.peter rimmer said:and for the record iam not mark brick so please refrain from calling me him
My 20 years as an expert witness in many high profile court cases cannot be written off with 1 badly scripted sentance. You have used iam again, you have spelt usually wrong as you habitually do, you have ended your posting in your normal manor, and if you were truly Peter Rimmer, so new to this site, how could you possibly know my previous posting habits. If we were in the courts here my friend, you would be proven to be the person whom posts as both Markbrick and Peter Rimmer. I urge you to admit your childish guilt, and i also urge the modorators on here to carry out the removal of one or other account holder.peter rimmer said:well sorry wunwin you are wrong,now is this the 1st time you have been wrong usely when proven you sneek back into the woodwork for a while but you are wrong,iam not markbrickwunwin said:Sorry to butt in, but i must add my comments to this. As a retired handwriting and language expert, used many times by the courts and the police, i have to say that your inflections in the construction of your sentances are identical to Markbricks. You try to hide it by using different words, but i have indefaticable proof that Markbrick and Peter Rimmer are one and the same. Little things, like the joining of i and am, to create iam, common to both site users. Also, look at the endings of the posts. They either end with no punctuation at all, or both users end with a comma after the penultimate word. This is what we in the buisiness call a literary fingerprint, exclusive to one person. It is usually a prouct of their education and regional upbringing, and manifests itself in spelling or grammatical errors. Markbrick and Peter Rimmer have all the same errors and traits. They are one and the same.peter rimmer said:and for the record iam not mark brick so please refrain from calling me him
well what ever,i will be who ever you want me to bewunwin said:My 20 years as an expert witness in many high profile court cases cannot be written off with 1 badly scripted sentance. You have used iam again, you have spelt usually wrong as you habitually do, you have ended your posting in your normal manor, and if you were truly Peter Rimmer, so new to this site, how could you possibly know my previous posting habits. If we were in the courts here my friend, you would be proven to be the person whom posts as both Markbrick and Peter Rimmer. I urge you to admit your childish guilt, and i also urge the modorators on here to carry out the removal of one or other account holder.peter rimmer said:well sorry wunwin you are wrong,now is this the 1st time you have been wrong usely when proven you sneek back into the woodwork for a while but you are wrong,iam not markbrickwunwin said:Sorry to butt in, but i must add my comments to this. As a retired handwriting and language expert, used many times by the courts and the police, i have to say that your inflections in the construction of your sentances are identical to Markbricks. You try to hide it by using different words, but i have indefaticable proof that Markbrick and Peter Rimmer are one and the same. Little things, like the joining of i and am, to create iam, common to both site users. Also, look at the endings of the posts. They either end with no punctuation at all, or both users end with a comma after the penultimate word. This is what we in the buisiness call a literary fingerprint, exclusive to one person. It is usually a prouct of their education and regional upbringing, and manifests itself in spelling or grammatical errors. Markbrick and Peter Rimmer have all the same errors and traits. They are one and the same.peter rimmer said:and for the record iam not mark brick so please refrain from calling me him
peter rimmer said:well what ever,i will be who ever you want me to be...signed mark, iam also petre rimmer ! (w00t) (w00t)wunwin said:My 20 years as an expert witness in many high profile court cases cannot be written off with 1 badly scripted sentance. You have used iam again, you have spelt usually wrong as you habitually do, you have ended your posting in your normal manor, and if you were truly Peter Rimmer, so new to this site, how could you possibly know my previous posting habits. If we were in the courts here my friend, you would be proven to be the person whom posts as both Markbrick and Peter Rimmer. I urge you to admit your childish guilt, and i also urge the modorators on here to carry out the removal of one or other account holder.peter rimmer said:well sorry wunwin you are wrong,now is this the 1st time you have been wrong usely when proven you sneek back into the woodwork for a while but you are wrong,iam not markbrickwunwin said:Sorry to butt in, but i must add my comments to this. As a retired handwriting and language expert, used many times by the courts and the police, i have to say that your inflections in the construction of your sentances are identical to Markbricks. You try to hide it by using different words, but i have indefaticable proof that Markbrick and Peter Rimmer are one and the same. Little things, like the joining of i and am, to create iam, common to both site users. Also, look at the endings of the posts. They either end with no punctuation at all, or both users end with a comma after the penultimate word. This is what we in the buisiness call a literary fingerprint, exclusive to one person. It is usually a prouct of their education and regional upbringing, and manifests itself in spelling or grammatical errors. Markbrick and Peter Rimmer have all the same errors and traits. They are one and the same.peter rimmer said:and for the record iam not mark brick so please refrain from calling me him
As usual, when confronted by overwhelming evidence, the guilty crack and admit their foolishness. In 20 years i have never failed to analize diction and language and to prove guilt. All i ask of you Markbrik is why did you feel the need to hide behind a nom de plume? Do you have a fundemental insecurity stemming from your childhood. Is your need to win and then brag about it due to the failings you felt at school? Were you never picked for the football team, and felt left out? Do not feel ashamed, but embrace your true identity. Markbrick, Peter Rimmer, whoever you are, we here on K9 are your family, we accept you for what you are, we want to get you through this period of self doubt you are going through. The gemini complex, spilt personality, can be difficult. We are here for you and your failings. Look to us for support.daffydill said:peter rimmer said:well what ever,i will be who ever you want me to be...signed mark, iam also petre rimmer ! (w00t) (w00t)wunwin said:My 20 years as an expert witness in many high profile court cases cannot be written off with 1 badly scripted sentance. You have used iam again, you have spelt usually wrong as you habitually do, you have ended your posting in your normal manor, and if you were truly Peter Rimmer, so new to this site, how could you possibly know my previous posting habits. If we were in the courts here my friend, you would be proven to be the person whom posts as both Markbrick and Peter Rimmer. I urge you to admit your childish guilt, and i also urge the modorators on here to carry out the removal of one or other account holder.peter rimmer said:well sorry wunwin you are wrong,now is this the 1st time you have been wrong usely when proven you sneek back into the woodwork for a while but you are wrong,iam not markbrickwunwin said:Sorry to butt in, but i must add my comments to this. As a retired handwriting and language expert, used many times by the courts and the police, i have to say that your inflections in the construction of your sentances are identical to Markbricks. You try to hide it by using different words, but i have indefaticable proof that Markbrick and Peter Rimmer are one and the same. Little things, like the joining of i and am, to create iam, common to both site users. Also, look at the endings of the posts. They either end with no punctuation at all, or both users end with a comma after the penultimate word. This is what we in the buisiness call a literary fingerprint, exclusive to one person. It is usually a prouct of their education and regional upbringing, and manifests itself in spelling or grammatical errors. Markbrick and Peter Rimmer have all the same errors and traits. They are one and the same.peter rimmer said:and for the record iam not mark brick so please refrain from calling me him
top post :thumbsup: but as the mods know and a few on here do i know mark and iam sure he is killing him self laughing at your post :thumbsup: especally the part not being picked for the school football team when most know he was picked for a top english rugby club and then travelled to australia to play,excellant post and i wouldnt want you on my side in any court of lawwunwin said:As usual, when confronted by overwhelming evidence, the guilty crack and admit their foolishness. In 20 years i have never failed to analize diction and language and to prove guilt. All i ask of you Markbrik is why did you feel the need to hide behind a nom de plume? Do you have a fundemental insecurity stemming from your childhood. Is your need to win and then brag about it due to the failings you felt at school? Were you never picked for the football team, and felt left out? Do not feel ashamed, but embrace your true identity. Markbrick, Peter Rimmer, whoever you are, we here on K9 are your family, we accept you for what you are, we want to get you through this period of self doubt you are going through. The gemini complex, spilt personality, can be difficult. We are here for you and your failings. Look to us for support.daffydill said:peter rimmer said:well what ever,i will be who ever you want me to be...signed mark, iam also petre rimmer ! (w00t) (w00t)wunwin said:My 20 years as an expert witness in many high profile court cases cannot be written off with 1 badly scripted sentance. You have used iam again, you have spelt usually wrong as you habitually do, you have ended your posting in your normal manor, and if you were truly Peter Rimmer, so new to this site, how could you possibly know my previous posting habits. If we were in the courts here my friend, you would be proven to be the person whom posts as both Markbrick and Peter Rimmer. I urge you to admit your childish guilt, and i also urge the modorators on here to carry out the removal of one or other account holder.peter rimmer said:well sorry wunwin you are wrong,now is this the 1st time you have been wrong usely when proven you sneek back into the woodwork for a while but you are wrong,iam not markbrickwunwin said:Sorry to butt in, but i must add my comments to this. As a retired handwriting and language expert, used many times by the courts and the police, i have to say that your inflections in the construction of your sentances are identical to Markbricks. You try to hide it by using different words, but i have indefaticable proof that Markbrick and Peter Rimmer are one and the same. Little things, like the joining of i and am, to create iam, common to both site users. Also, look at the endings of the posts. They either end with no punctuation at all, or both users end with a comma after the penultimate word. This is what we in the buisiness call a literary fingerprint, exclusive to one person. It is usually a prouct of their education and regional upbringing, and manifests itself in spelling or grammatical errors. Markbrick and Peter Rimmer have all the same errors and traits. They are one and the same.peter rimmer said:and for the record iam not mark brick so please refrain from calling me him
Ah but Wunwin said football he never mentioned rugby :- "peter rimmer said:top post :thumbsup: but as the mods know and a few on here do i know mark and iam sure he is killing him self laughing at your post :thumbsup: especally the part not being picked for the school football team when most know he was picked for a top english rugby club and then travelled to australia to play,excellant post and i wouldnt want you on my side in any court of lawwunwin said:As usual, when confronted by overwhelming evidence, the guilty crack and admit their foolishness. In 20 years i have never failed to analize diction and language and to prove guilt. All i ask of you Markbrik is why did you feel the need to hide behind a nom de plume? Do you have a fundemental insecurity stemming from your childhood. Is your need to win and then brag about it due to the failings you felt at school? Were you never picked for the football team, and felt left out? Do not feel ashamed, but embrace your true identity. Markbrick, Peter Rimmer, whoever you are, we here on K9 are your family, we accept you for what you are, we want to get you through this period of self doubt you are going through. The gemini complex, spilt personality, can be difficult. We are here for you and your failings. Look to us for support.daffydill said:peter rimmer said:well what ever,i will be who ever you want me to be...signed mark, iam also petre rimmer ! (w00t) (w00t)wunwin said:My 20 years as an expert witness in many high profile court cases cannot be written off with 1 badly scripted sentance. You have used iam again, you have spelt usually wrong as you habitually do, you have ended your posting in your normal manor, and if you were truly Peter Rimmer, so new to this site, how could you possibly know my previous posting habits. If we were in the courts here my friend, you would be proven to be the person whom posts as both Markbrick and Peter Rimmer. I urge you to admit your childish guilt, and i also urge the modorators on here to carry out the removal of one or other account holder.peter rimmer said:well sorry wunwin you are wrong,now is this the 1st time you have been wrong usely when proven you sneek back into the woodwork for a while but you are wrong,iam not markbrickwunwin said:Sorry to butt in, but i must add my comments to this. As a retired handwriting and language expert, used many times by the courts and the police, i have to say that your inflections in the construction of your sentances are identical to Markbricks. You try to hide it by using different words, but i have indefaticable proof that Markbrick and Peter Rimmer are one and the same. Little things, like the joining of i and am, to create iam, common to both site users. Also, look at the endings of the posts. They either end with no punctuation at all, or both users end with a comma after the penultimate word. This is what we in the buisiness call a literary fingerprint, exclusive to one person. It is usually a prouct of their education and regional upbringing, and manifests itself in spelling or grammatical errors. Markbrick and Peter Rimmer have all the same errors and traits. They are one and the same.peter rimmer said:and for the record iam not mark brick so please refrain from calling me him
Join our vibrant online community dedicated to all things canine. Whether you're a seasoned owner or new to the world of dogs, our forum is your go-to hub for sharing stories, seeking advice, and connecting with fellow dog lovers. From training tips to health concerns, we cover it all. Register now and unleash the full potential of your dog-loving experience!
Login or Register