- Messages
- 298
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Grab a cuppa before tackling this prose!
Maturity in a youngster isn't necessarily an asset. It just means they may win early on.
Judges are there to judge the best dog ON THE DAY regardless of it's age or level of maturity. There's nothing wrong with a 6 month old dog winning on the day if it is the best. Just because a dog is older, say 3 years, doesn't mean it should win because it is a mature representative of the breed.
I don't ask ages of dogs or place them on age. In fact, the age and development of the dog is immaterial to me as a judge. As a judge, I may award a young dog a CC but as a breeder I may consider it overdone for age. Remember, you wear two hats and judges that cannot change hats don't make the best judges.
Judges are trained to ask ages not because they need to know but purely to put the handler and dog at ease. I don't like it when judges make decisions based on age.
I guess age classes are more important for some breeds (and judges) than others. Some overseas judges like to know they are awarding the CC to a mature dog. Large and giant breeds take much longer to mature and there is a huge variation between a youngster and a fully mature 6 year old. Toy breeds don't have as much variation between an 8 month old and a 2 year old. For me, the age classes allow me to exhibit several dogs myself without having them all in the one class. I'm currently exhibiting 3-4 bitches so I'm able to have them in different classes.
In Australia we have age classes so exhibits have the chance to win an age class in group against similarly aged other breeds.
I totally agree with your sentiment that exhibitors are wanting dogs mature far too early. They want to win NOW and don't want to wait for a dog to mature slowly. I believe there is more emphasis on winning now more than ever before and the internet allows exhibitors to spread the news of their wins further afield. This list and others are testament to that.
The internet IMHO, has changed the dog world detrimentally. Advertising can/may influence judges, other breeders, potential puppy buyers and breeders. If you are aware a dog with many BOB's or BIS wins, it would take a brave or foolish judge to ignore that dog.
There are also more dogs/semen being imported / exported than ever before and so if a dog carries a particular trait, it can become widespread rapidly.
Breeds clubs appear to have fewer members than ever before so who really is the guardian / custodian of breeds? There are no longer large kennels with acknowledged and respected breed mentors. Everyone's a 'breeder/exhibitor' - or at least they are here.
I do agree with I think it was Jax's comment about looking at the number of puppies exhibited and how many are still exhibited as adults. I often search back through catalogues and am constantly amazed at the number of puppies that 'disappear'.
Overall, I do believe the best dog wins more than it loses. And dogs that win well as youngsters tend to grow up and win well as adults.
Cheers
Maturity in a youngster isn't necessarily an asset. It just means they may win early on.
Judges are there to judge the best dog ON THE DAY regardless of it's age or level of maturity. There's nothing wrong with a 6 month old dog winning on the day if it is the best. Just because a dog is older, say 3 years, doesn't mean it should win because it is a mature representative of the breed.
I don't ask ages of dogs or place them on age. In fact, the age and development of the dog is immaterial to me as a judge. As a judge, I may award a young dog a CC but as a breeder I may consider it overdone for age. Remember, you wear two hats and judges that cannot change hats don't make the best judges.
Judges are trained to ask ages not because they need to know but purely to put the handler and dog at ease. I don't like it when judges make decisions based on age.
I guess age classes are more important for some breeds (and judges) than others. Some overseas judges like to know they are awarding the CC to a mature dog. Large and giant breeds take much longer to mature and there is a huge variation between a youngster and a fully mature 6 year old. Toy breeds don't have as much variation between an 8 month old and a 2 year old. For me, the age classes allow me to exhibit several dogs myself without having them all in the one class. I'm currently exhibiting 3-4 bitches so I'm able to have them in different classes.
In Australia we have age classes so exhibits have the chance to win an age class in group against similarly aged other breeds.
I totally agree with your sentiment that exhibitors are wanting dogs mature far too early. They want to win NOW and don't want to wait for a dog to mature slowly. I believe there is more emphasis on winning now more than ever before and the internet allows exhibitors to spread the news of their wins further afield. This list and others are testament to that.
The internet IMHO, has changed the dog world detrimentally. Advertising can/may influence judges, other breeders, potential puppy buyers and breeders. If you are aware a dog with many BOB's or BIS wins, it would take a brave or foolish judge to ignore that dog.
There are also more dogs/semen being imported / exported than ever before and so if a dog carries a particular trait, it can become widespread rapidly.
Breeds clubs appear to have fewer members than ever before so who really is the guardian / custodian of breeds? There are no longer large kennels with acknowledged and respected breed mentors. Everyone's a 'breeder/exhibitor' - or at least they are here.
I do agree with I think it was Jax's comment about looking at the number of puppies exhibited and how many are still exhibited as adults. I often search back through catalogues and am constantly amazed at the number of puppies that 'disappear'.
Overall, I do believe the best dog wins more than it loses. And dogs that win well as youngsters tend to grow up and win well as adults.
Cheers