Back in October 2018 I had a small birthday party at my house for my just turned 4 year old daughter. Along with a number of other children she played outside in the garden with my 7 year old Springer plus my brother’s 6 month old cocker (both are pets & house dogs)
Later that evening I wasn’t present but it appears my springer got into the house unnoticed. He crawled under the dining table and was followed in by a child.
Unfortunately whatever went on under the table resulted in a snap from my dog and the child with a laceration on her lip.
The dog was immediately removed, child was given first aid and taken to hospital. The wound needed to be cleaned and stitched up. I visited by the dog warden the following day after it had been reported and I was reassured he would not be seizing my dog, having it euthanised et.
To satisfy my own concerns I paid for a Dog Behaviourist to assess my dog given I have two young children, he has never done anything like this before. Dog Behaviourist after assessment has provided me with a report stating the dog has most likely displayed all possible signs prior to the snap and is not believed to be a danger to public safety, and more importantly to my children.
Four months later I receive a court summons to attend court. Having read the child’s mother’s statement, it does not tally up with other witnesses in the room. (She alleges she saw the dog come towards her child whereas other witnesses would say she was seated at a wooden dining table and the dog & child were underneath).
The child is fine, she has a small silver mark on her upper lip, am I wrong to contest her statement??
Later that evening I wasn’t present but it appears my springer got into the house unnoticed. He crawled under the dining table and was followed in by a child.
Unfortunately whatever went on under the table resulted in a snap from my dog and the child with a laceration on her lip.
The dog was immediately removed, child was given first aid and taken to hospital. The wound needed to be cleaned and stitched up. I visited by the dog warden the following day after it had been reported and I was reassured he would not be seizing my dog, having it euthanised et.
To satisfy my own concerns I paid for a Dog Behaviourist to assess my dog given I have two young children, he has never done anything like this before. Dog Behaviourist after assessment has provided me with a report stating the dog has most likely displayed all possible signs prior to the snap and is not believed to be a danger to public safety, and more importantly to my children.
Four months later I receive a court summons to attend court. Having read the child’s mother’s statement, it does not tally up with other witnesses in the room. (She alleges she saw the dog come towards her child whereas other witnesses would say she was seated at a wooden dining table and the dog & child were underneath).
The child is fine, she has a small silver mark on her upper lip, am I wrong to contest her statement??