- Messages
- 152
- Reaction score
- 23
- Points
- 18
So...after Mr Cash had, what I believe to be, his first seizure last year, followed by another last night and has been diagnosed as idiopathic seizures, naturally I have been doing a bit of research. As is probably obvious it is recommended that dogs diagnosed with the above should not be used for breeding -
When I rehomed Mr Cash at one year old from who I believe is the breeder who claimed he sold the pup then took him back when he was advised he wasn't being looked after I was sure there must be some reason why he was so willing to sell him on so cheap and easily especially considering his pedigree etc. However general health tests came back fine (though idiopathic seizures wouldn't show on any tests)
Anyway I love the dog to bits and it makes no difference to me I always, always, rehome/rescue dogs and whatever "issues" they come with I will deal with and do the best I can. However it all seems to be clicking in to place now......was my boy returned to the breeder because he had seizures and therefore couldn't be used for further breeding?? And is that why he was passed on to me so easily?? It makes sense to me but maybe I am looking in to it too much?? Would it be wrong of me to contact the breeder (Should I be able to find a means to) to inform him of his condition (considering it is advised that none of his siblings be used for breeding either and I know they are) and at the very least to ask if there is any kind of history of it in his bloodline because apparently it can be hereditary?
As I say it makes no difference whatsoever to me. My pets are just that...pets to be loved and cared for I have no interest in making money of them and I will look after Cash in whichever way he needs. I just wonder how much has actually been known and has he been "cat off" because of this.....that makes me sad and angry! xx
When I rehomed Mr Cash at one year old from who I believe is the breeder who claimed he sold the pup then took him back when he was advised he wasn't being looked after I was sure there must be some reason why he was so willing to sell him on so cheap and easily especially considering his pedigree etc. However general health tests came back fine (though idiopathic seizures wouldn't show on any tests)
Anyway I love the dog to bits and it makes no difference to me I always, always, rehome/rescue dogs and whatever "issues" they come with I will deal with and do the best I can. However it all seems to be clicking in to place now......was my boy returned to the breeder because he had seizures and therefore couldn't be used for further breeding?? And is that why he was passed on to me so easily?? It makes sense to me but maybe I am looking in to it too much?? Would it be wrong of me to contact the breeder (Should I be able to find a means to) to inform him of his condition (considering it is advised that none of his siblings be used for breeding either and I know they are) and at the very least to ask if there is any kind of history of it in his bloodline because apparently it can be hereditary?
As I say it makes no difference whatsoever to me. My pets are just that...pets to be loved and cared for I have no interest in making money of them and I will look after Cash in whichever way he needs. I just wonder how much has actually been known and has he been "cat off" because of this.....that makes me sad and angry! xx