- Messages
- 8,199
- Reaction score
- 9,920
- Points
- 113
It's that time of year again - my guilty pleasure. Is anyone else watching it?
I was so disappointed with the winner of the Utility class, a French Bulldog. The breed standard has been updated to read 'Well defined muzzle, that can clearly be viewed in profile, broad, deep and set back', but the Frenchie had no discernable muzzle that I could see. Crufts argue that it has passed the newly introduced respiratory test. It's good that they're testing (I belive this is optional this year but will become mandatory), but (a) as far as I could see, this dog didn't meet the breed standards so shouldn't have won, and (b) just because one dog doesn't have respiratory problems, that doesn't mean that this face profile is inherently healthy. Such a flat face has to be a health risk, regardless of whether some dogs are able to be healthy.
What is the problem with breeding Frenchies with slightly longer muzzles, which is how they used to look in the past? It makes no sense to me at all.
I was so disappointed with the winner of the Utility class, a French Bulldog. The breed standard has been updated to read 'Well defined muzzle, that can clearly be viewed in profile, broad, deep and set back', but the Frenchie had no discernable muzzle that I could see. Crufts argue that it has passed the newly introduced respiratory test. It's good that they're testing (I belive this is optional this year but will become mandatory), but (a) as far as I could see, this dog didn't meet the breed standards so shouldn't have won, and (b) just because one dog doesn't have respiratory problems, that doesn't mean that this face profile is inherently healthy. Such a flat face has to be a health risk, regardless of whether some dogs are able to be healthy.
What is the problem with breeding Frenchies with slightly longer muzzles, which is how they used to look in the past? It makes no sense to me at all.