I live in Scotland so i never voted for postal votes to stop nor did my fellow racers up here. We cant go to any AGMs because its to far for us to travel to and it would cost us a few pounds to do so.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AND WHO ARE YOU????I DONT THINK I KNOW YOU SORRY....tony warren said:i agree that the ban should stay till next year it was voted in by those who attended. and those that voted you can say dont want it now otherwise, what was the point of going to the a.g.m. loseing a days pay and 3hrs drive. if you want the ban lifted go next year and vote for it, otherwise if you dont like whats been voted in then lets have a free for all and make the rules up as we go along.
course they dont make the dogs run any faster, but they sure make a big differene to times that dogs can run 30/40 spots .....SO WHERE DO THEY FIND THIS TIME DIFFRENTS THEN? WHEN USING A BOARD ?With the lack of an official statement from the fed on this issue ....WHY DO THE FED HAVE TO EXPLAIN ANY THING ? CAUSE THEY ARE NOT THE ONES BANNING ANYTHING....
@ NEIL
The majority of BWRA members obviously didn`t vote at all.
126 (those that voted in favour of a true AGM) is only about 20% of the total membership.
Less than 100 members attended the AGM; 42 voted to ban kickboards, less than 10% of membership. Doesn`t seem a good way to run a democratic organization to me.
I ONLY HAVE ONE THING TO SAY ...BRING BACK POSTAL VOTING...
SOLUTION ....IF YOU DONT WANT TO USE THEM" DONT" ... NOBODY IS TELLING ME HOW TO RUN MY DOGS
It seems I may have been right after all Steve, we didn`t actually vote for the abolition of postal voting - that was decided by the committee, but we did vote to allow members to be allowed to make proposals which is something completely different. Since a the abolition of a postal vote was NOT voted in by the members then the vote at the AGM cannot be valid until all those members that did not attend have been given an opportunity to vote -by post if they wish. What is there to stop the committee holding the AGM in Tenerife?Truth about the vote for a true AGM. this was brought in for one reason only. At AGM's in years prior to this one the reps of each area had a meeting with that present committee to decide what proposals should or should not be voted on in a postal ballot. The reps were not doing as they should and having an area meeting to decide how each area wanted to vote on proposals and therefore it was left to their own thoughts on what ordinary members could or could not vote on.The proposal was for all members to be allowed to say what proposals could be voted on at a postal ballot. The committee of the BWRA took this as meaning that there was no need for a postal ballot, they inturn through Doreen Hopkins were told that it was not meant to get rid of a postal ballot but to ensue that those who bothered to attend an AGM could vote on what proposals went to a postal ballot. It was the committee that said that there would be no postal vote this year, they made this assumption in all good faith i presume, but if you do not like what you have, propose an ammendment at next years AGM
Join our vibrant online community dedicated to all things canine. Whether you're a seasoned owner or new to the world of dogs, our forum is your go-to hub for sharing stories, seeking advice, and connecting with fellow dog lovers. From training tips to health concerns, we cover it all. Register now and unleash the full potential of your dog-loving experience!
Login or Register