very true, but without wishing to start any arguements, just because a dog is non ped doesnt exclude it from certain conditions. papers or not, surely any responsible breeder would want to only use the healthiest stud?Vicky said:Obviously in non ped whippets non of the above is necessary and the cost of putting a dog at stud is nothing in comparison to raising a litter well.kris said:dunno about it being cheap to have a stud dog but in dobermanns we had to have them xrayed for hip dysplasia and scored for cervical spondylosis and that wasnt cheap i can tell you. (w00t) i know theres no comparison between that and the money it costs to rear a litter of pups (and thats without the vets bills!) but in most pedigree dogs these days noone will use a dog unless its been tested and scored for all the breed problems that can occur in a breed.also you can be held legally liable these days for breeding a pup with inheirited disorders so its better to be safe than sorry as any puppy owner taking a breeder to court would have an extremely good case in law if the breeder didnt use a dog at stud that had been tested and scored.it amounts to negligence in a legal case.
on epupz i've seen a non kc reg staff stud whose owner still paid out for an eye test.
but on the flip side, i've also seen on champdogs a kc reg staff stud being offered out despite NO eyetest, as well as being one balled :wacko:
oh well. at the end of the day, everyone makes their own choices.