- Messages
- 618
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
i couldnt agree with you more patsy! i would never do back to back matings myself and there is no point talking about the kennel club as most of those doing this are accredited breaders whAT A LAUGH
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
6 litters three should be the max whatever the circsCheers Tracey for the link............I am shocked that in this day and age of bad press that the guidelines for breeding are not tighter or better worded. Better worded = no more than 6 litters............bitches not under a year.................not over 8 years old................even with my poor grasp of mathematics that makes for some breeding machine, so very shocking.
I do think there could be additional guidelines from the BC's and yes I agree it would only apply to members but surely we are all in this breed because we love it and want to do the best by it???????????
or I would like to hope so anyway...............................
But am I right in thinking that before the KC's new code of ethics HAD to be adopted by B.C's, each club had their own for their members and, if I remember correctly, some were quite abit more specific on breeding. Therefore there is a lost opportunity and IMO a backward step too.
And as this new code of ethics has been drawn up by the KC, and not the B.C's, surely the 'punishment' for breaking this code now rests with the KC?
So have the B.C's now lost some of their powers in maintaining standards (not breed standards!) within the Whippet community????
i totaly agree about the accredited breeder the rules need changingAs breed clubs and the breed council, we can all have our own code of ethics, but there will always be people who think it doesn't apply to them. They see themselves as responsible.Also none of it matters to puppy farmers.
The KC really had the opportunity when they brought in the Accredited Breeder membership, but it has no teeth, just having a certificate on the wall doesn't guarantee good quality, well reared and well bred puppies.
I think we need to be firm with our members who do not adhere to our code of ethics and refuse them membership and ban them from shows.
Now ducking for cover.
As breed clubs and the breed council, we can all have our own code of ethics, but there will always be people who think it doesn't apply to them. They see themselves as responsible.Also none of it matters to puppy farmers.
The KC really had the opportunity when they brought in the Accredited Breeder membership, but it has no teeth, just having a certificate on the wall doesn't guarantee good quality, well reared and well bred puppies.
I think we need to be firm with our members who do not adhere to our code of ethics and refuse them membership and ban them from shows.
Now ducking for cover.
The Kennel Club have allowed a golden opportunity to slip by. When they introduced their code of conduct that they expect all breed clubs to adopt, why on earth did they not apply this to their own clubs registration department???? It would instantly stop these people from over breeding, breeders from having two litters at the same time or within a couple of weeks between breeding. They could have stated that anyone breeding more than one litter in any 12 months would not be allowed to register their litter.I know it's draconian, but how can we protect our breed from people who exploit them and breed purely for cash. After all, having to litters at the same time can only be for money.
The Kennel Club have allowed a golden opportunity to slip by. When they introduced their code of conduct that they expect all breed clubs to adopt, why on earth did they not apply this to their own clubs registration department???? It would instantly stop these people from over breeding, breeders from having two litters at the same time or within a couple of weeks between breeding. They could have stated that anyone breeding more than one litter in any 12 months would not be allowed to register their litter.I know it's draconian, but how can we protect our breed from people who exploit them and breed purely for cash. After all, having to litters at the same time can only be for money.
I do not think that you can make a sweeping statement like that regarding people who may have two litters at the one time unless they are repeatedly doing it....as in some cases there may be certain extenuaiting circumstances that you know nothing about. We have recently just had two litters on the ground at once (they were three weeks apart & believe you me it was the one and only time that I would EVER contemplate doing it,it was utter chaos!) and I can honestly say hand on heart that we never made any amount of profit worth mentioning from either litter!! In fact I can tell you that IF raised correctly, you do not make a profit from any litter,so the people making money from breeding & using their dogs as a commodity & churning out litter after litter are not raising their litters correctly!!
We DO NOT as a rule normally even have 2 litters in the one year let alone at the same time but circumstances dictated different this time around & it was either to do the two matings then or never at all. I wont go into details on the forum about this,but people who know me know EXACTLY why it was done this time & also know that as most of our puppies from these litters have gone abroad and therefore we have had to hold onto them longer than most (in fact I still have two here,one goes on the 15th & the other 21st of this month) and the fact that we dont charge for keeping them until they can leave, the cost of the food bills etc has far outweighed any profit that might've been left. So I think it is totally unfair to "tar everyone with the one brush" if they happen to have two litters on the ground at the one time,as we don't all breed solely for profit,there are other reasons for breeding a litter.
I think as is mentioned in this thread,that you only need to read the BRS to find out who is breeding what & how often and I also think that some of you might be quite surprised or shocked even to realise that it is NOT only the "unknown's" that are repeatedly breeding litter after litter but some people a little "closer to home" too!
The Kennel Club have allowed a golden opportunity to slip by. When they introduced their code of conduct that they expect all breed clubs to adopt, why on earth did they not apply this to their own clubs registration department???? It would instantly stop these people from over breeding, breeders from having two litters at the same time or within a couple of weeks between breeding. They could have stated that anyone breeding more than one litter in any 12 months would not be allowed to register their litter.I know it's draconian, but how can we protect our breed from people who exploit them and breed purely for cash. After all, having to litters at the same time can only be for money.
I do not think that you can make a sweeping statement like that regarding people who may have two litters at the one time unless they are repeatedly doing it....as in some cases there may be certain extenuaiting circumstances that you know nothing about. We have recently just had two litters on the ground at once (they were three weeks apart & believe you me it was the one and only time that I would EVER contemplate doing it,it was utter chaos!) and I can honestly say hand on heart that we never made any amount of profit worth mentioning from either litter!! In fact I can tell you that IF raised correctly, you do not make a profit from any litter,so the people making money from breeding & using their dogs as a commodity & churning out litter after litter are not raising their litters correctly!!
We DO NOT as a rule normally even have 2 litters in the one year let alone at the same time but circumstances dictated different this time around & it was either to do the two matings then or never at all. I wont go into details on the forum about this,but people who know me know EXACTLY why it was done this time & also know that as most of our puppies from these litters have gone abroad and therefore we have had to hold onto them longer than most (in fact I still have two here,one goes on the 15th & the other 21st of this month) and the fact that we dont charge for keeping them until they can leave, the cost of the food bills etc has far outweighed any profit that might've been left. So I think it is totally unfair to "tar everyone with the one brush" if they happen to have two litters on the ground at the one time,as we don't all breed solely for profit,there are other reasons for breeding a litter.
I think as is mentioned in this thread,that you only need to read the BRS to find out who is breeding what & how often and I also think that some of you might be quite surprised or shocked even to realise that it is NOT only the "unknown's" that are repeatedly breeding litter after litter but some people a little "closer to home" too!
i totaly agree if you rear your puppies properly you make no profit
mine have the best of everything i found their favourite food is the frying steak rosie and katie still have it now bill and he's litter brothers loved the cooked chicens you get from the butchers by the time you get all the meats they like and the puppy complete you make nothing i just enjoy my babies and my dogs so they get the best i can give them if they could talk they would tell you themselfs
i must admiti am not finding it hard work yes it takes time to put them out play with them clean them out and put them back to bed mine live in the hose but go out in my kennel while i am sorting out their room thats katie's pups rosie has only got 6 and they are two weeks younger so they are still easy
no i wouldnt by choice have two litters
their are a lot of breeders who are breeding a lot not only in whippets but other breeds
The Kennel Club have allowed a golden opportunity to slip by. When they introduced their code of conduct that they expect all breed clubs to adopt, why on earth did they not apply this to their own clubs registration department???? It would instantly stop these people from over breeding, breeders from having two litters at the same time or within a couple of weeks between breeding. They could have stated that anyone breeding more than one litter in any 12 months would not be allowed to register their litter.I know it's draconian, but how can we protect our breed from people who exploit them and breed purely for cash. After all, having to litters at the same time can only be for money.
I do not think that you can make a sweeping statement like that regarding people who may have two litters at the one time unless they are repeatedly doing it....as in some cases there may be certain extenuaiting circumstances that you know nothing about. We have recently just had two litters on the ground at once (they were three weeks apart & believe you me it was the one and only time that I would EVER contemplate doing it,it was utter chaos!) and I can honestly say hand on heart that we never made any amount of profit worth mentioning from either litter!! In fact I can tell you that IF raised correctly, you do not make a profit from any litter,so the people making money from breeding & using their dogs as a commodity & churning out litter after litter are not raising their litters correctly!!
We DO NOT as a rule normally even have 2 litters in the one year let alone at the same time but circumstances dictated different this time around & it was either to do the two matings then or never at all. I wont go into details on the forum about this,but people who know me know EXACTLY why it was done this time & also know that as most of our puppies from these litters have gone abroad and therefore we have had to hold onto them longer than most (in fact I still have two here,one goes on the 15th & the other 21st of this month) and the fact that we dont charge for keeping them until they can leave, the cost of the food bills etc has far outweighed any profit that might've been left. So I think it is totally unfair to "tar everyone with the one brush" if they happen to have two litters on the ground at the one time,as we don't all breed solely for profit,there are other reasons for breeding a litter.
I think as is mentioned in this thread,that you only need to read the BRS to find out who is breeding what & how often and I also think that some of you might be quite surprised or shocked even to realise that it is NOT only the "unknown's" that are repeatedly breeding litter after litter but some people a little "closer to home" too!
i totaly agree if you rear your puppies properly you make no profit
mine have the best of everything i found their favourite food is the frying steak rosie and katie still have it now bill and he's litter brothers loved the cooked chicens you get from the butchers by the time you get all the meats they like and the puppy complete you make nothing i just enjoy my babies and my dogs so they get the best i can give them if they could talk they would tell you themselfs
i must admiti am not finding it hard work yes it takes time to put them out play with them clean them out and put them back to bed mine live in the hose but go out in my kennel while i am sorting out their room thats katie's pups rosie has only got 6 and they are two weeks younger so they are still easy
no i wouldnt by choice have two litters
their are a lot of breeders who are breeding a lot not only in whippets but other breeds
i wouldnt by choice have two litters "
I don`t usally comment on breeding practices as I am a complete novice and my whippet is purely a much loved pet...but even as a novice, I`m sure that you must have put both of your bitches to stud by choice.
"
Good post and so very true. I know AB,s who breed none stop, litter after litter and charge top prices for what are basically pet bred pups. Another thing that really annoys me is well know people allowing these ABs to use their stud dogs!!!!!!!!!!! You just have to look at the BRS to see what I mean.I spoke to the KC about the Accredited Breeders Scheme, they told me that if I am not an AB they can't "guarentee" my pups like they can an AB's pups as I am only a hobby breeder. I did point out that the AB down the road that they have never met, never checked etc could be a puppy farmer with the pups in appalling conditions and how on earth could they "guarentee" anything.
They have ONE home checker for the whole country. ONE. I am going to suggest that they send out a questionairre to any applicants previous puppy buyers. It can be annonymous, at least it would give them some feedback.
I am furious that the decent people who won't join the scheme because of its flaws are classed far below the ones that have rushed to join up, I am NOT saying that all AB are bad, JUST that they should be checked before being guaranteed by the KC.
Well it would be a bit of a bugger if the person chosen to check you was someone who could not give an unbiased opinion, for whatever reasonGood post and so very true. I know AB,s who breed none stop, litter after litter and charge top prices for what are basically pet bred pups. Another thing that really annoys me is well know people allowing these ABs to use their stud dogs!!!!!!!!!!! You just have to look at the BRS to see what I mean.I spoke to the KC about the Accredited Breeders Scheme, they told me that if I am not an AB they can't "guarentee" my pups like they can an AB's pups as I am only a hobby breeder. I did point out that the AB down the road that they have never met, never checked etc could be a puppy farmer with the pups in appalling conditions and how on earth could they "guarentee" anything.
They have ONE home checker for the whole country. ONE. I am going to suggest that they send out a questionairre to any applicants previous puppy buyers. It can be annonymous, at least it would give them some feedback.
I am furious that the decent people who won't join the scheme because of its flaws are classed far below the ones that have rushed to join up, I am NOT saying that all AB are bad, JUST that they should be checked before being guaranteed by the KC.
In an ideal world, [ha ha] breeding would only take place when the bitches owner wants a puppy to continue their line and bring on a pup to show. After all, most litters, show, race or what ever will be sold on after the owners choice is made, as pets, pets only! It would cut down the numbers of ill thought out litters, the people who have a litter just because they think it would be fun.
Things were so much better about 15 to 18 years ago, at least breeders thought about what they were doing. Another thought, why cant' the KC appoint home checkers from the whippet clubs and the Breed Council, that way the wrong doers would be ousted, [bit strong] :'( .
I'd better stop now before I get shot :lol:
I can see why you might be concerned about breeders with multiple litters on the ground but I'm struggling to see what's wrong with breeding 2 litters from different bitches in a 12 mth period. I have a friend who this year chose to breed a second litter from her bitch and to breed from her keeper from that bitches first litter. She wasn't breeding for money and has, as intended, kept a pup from each litter. She won't be breeding at all next year, didn't last year, and has only bred these 3 litters in total, so why would her 2 litters this year be reason to disallow registration. She could have chosen to breed once from each bitch in consecutive years and would have bred the same number of puppies in total. Surely it's not how many litters in any given year (within reason) that's the problem, but how many pups overall. Personally I think bitches should be limited to 3 litters max, with at least a year between litters, but that's just my opinion.The Kennel Club have allowed a golden opportunity to slip by. When they introduced their code of conduct that they expect all breed clubs to adopt, why on earth did they not apply this to their own clubs registration department???? It would instantly stop these people from over breeding, breeders from having two litters at the same time or within a couple of weeks between breeding. They could have stated that anyone breeding more than one litter in any 12 months would not be allowed to register their litter.I know it's draconian, but how can we protect our breed from people who exploit them and breed purely for cash. After all, having to litters at the same time can only be for money.
Join our vibrant online community dedicated to all things canine. Whether you're a seasoned owner or new to the world of dogs, our forum is your go-to hub for sharing stories, seeking advice, and connecting with fellow dog lovers. From training tips to health concerns, we cover it all. Register now and unleash the full potential of your dog-loving experience!
Login or Register