- Messages
- 18,037
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
No of course no offence Katie.....k4tie-d said:janis no offence but i can understand why they wernt bothered by it, as star still has both of hers, and ruby only 1, but the other looks as though its thinking about growing back. im pretty sure rosie said the skye still had hers too, so the person who did them didnt do it right :- "Janimal said:Ive only seen this done the once but there were 10 pups...and I can honestly say hand on heart...there is hardly any pain...in fact the puppies only made a little squeak and then were put back in with mam. No blood...a tiny little speck which healed almost straight away....it seemed pretty painless to me. :thumbsup: At 2-3 days old there is very little there in the way of a nailbed/nail, so hence the best time to do it.doggy182 said:Don't think I want to know how they
In all honesty I would rather my dogs didnt have them....but it was too late to remove Archies so he still has his...so guess Ill have to take a chance this time.
:huggles:
I felt aweful because I asked this person to do it for them (Sonya and Trevor)
and some of the dew claws came back, which can happen if they are not taken off close enough... I think Flint or little Ellie has one of theirs too...
I really wanted Archies doing, but couldnt get anyone at the time then, wished Id done them myself now...after watching how it was done with the Gems it seemed quite easy...I just think he didnt get close enough.
Honestly Katie, even if its done right...it dosnt hurt them.
Last edited by a moderator: