- Messages
- 6,480
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 0
Restricting stud use wont cull puppy farming UNLESS some form of compulsary licencing was brought in. If dogs could be traced back to their owners and rescues could reimburse from the breeder their costs for housing and rehoming then people wouldn't look at breeding dogs as a second income. However.......IF I charge them Anne I charge £150, I have on occassion asked for a pup if I like a bitches working abilities(I have been out with most of the bitches brought to him) and then GIVEN those pups to friends who work their dogsJust as a matter of interest, what is Sonny's stud fee. There is a reason for this question by the way. I'll tell you when you answer my query! )
And if people honestly think restricting the use of stud dogs to the general public is going to stop the breeding of pups then they are mistaken, and I think most people are hypocritical, if it isnt about money then only charge £100/pup about the cost of rearing one properly not £600 for one from shown parents
Restricting stud duties to twice per year over a studs lifetime would be beneficial to genetic diversity. DNA profiling would of course be a neccesity to ensure this is adhered to. My own opinion is that the KC should get their finger out and make registration something of worth but they cannot do this on their own..As you know Darren the Kennel Club are to restrict the number of litters a bitch can have, do you think that legislation should be brought in to restrict the number of litters a dog can sire and if so how would you decide which bitches were more suitable than others. In addition do you think all dogs should be DNA profiled and do you agree that there are too many whippet puppies being bred and is this a ticking time bomb for the rescue organisations to have to deal with.
Where responsible breeders fall flat on their faces is by letting their breedlines fall into dubious hands. Responsible breeders should be spending a small fortune on conditioning their dogs and should be tight fisted about who gets their pups and who uses their studs. Pups not being retained by the breeder should be sold at minimal price without papers. If every decent breeder did this there would be two outcomes - 1) Those puppy farmers riding on your coat tails would be undercut by the market 2) those amateur dog breeders who decide they'll make a quick buck from your pup one day will decide the expenditure of such a venture too expensive to bother with.
The fact is though, the vast majority of breeders are too stubborn to devalue their lines, putting all their worth on a piece of paper that is slowly becoming attributed to buying a dog with genetic defects.
Non-peds probably have the biggest expenditure as a whippet. Being the fastest of the breeds, they are more likely to pick up an injury. These dogs are fed lots of high quality feed and fresh meat for muscle conditioning. They go to vets, osteopaths, physios and greyhound men, more often than not at the other end of the country on a monthly basis. Owners take them swimming, buy expensive physio equipment, porta mags, embrocations, treadmills etc etc. They go racing weekly at clubs and across the country at events on the weekends. The expenditure is huge along with the time.
Price of a stud about £100. Price of a pup £150 - £250.
Keeping 21 racers, youngsters and OAP's to their dying day regardless of their abilities - Priceless.
I think our bank manager would say we're definately going wrong somewhere but I can sleep well at night knowing dogs we've bred are either sleeping in our home or with loving pet homes where their owners couldn't give a damn about their breeding because all they ever wanted was a pet whippet and that was exactly what they was sold.