- Messages
- 4,604
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
The Australian standard says:
Eyes: oval, bright, expression very alert
In the extended standard it states:
Eye colour is not mentioned in the Standard, however, a light eye tends to spoil the expression; it is generally accepted that a dark eye is preferrable.
Personally I can't see that a blue eye ruins an alert expression. I have not seen many adult whippets with blue eyes apart from the pics on here, but for me I can't say it makes them look less alert. It may not make them look as sweet but the standard doesn't call for a sweet expression, it calls for an alert expression.
However, the extended standard also lists harsh/staring eyes as a fault. This seems a contradiction to me when 'sweet' is not asked for in the standard wording.
I think if whilst I was judging in Australia or the UK (or any other country whose standard had the same wording) I found a dog that was extremely good in all other aspects, I would find it hard to not place it because of a blue eye alone, purely on what the standard says.
If I were judging in the US then I would have to disqualify the same dog.
Coming from a childhood in Dalmatians where a blue eye is considered a major fault - it is difficult to drag oneself away from that feeling. But I had to make myself look at the standard and then look at the dogs here with blue eyes and I really can't see that it makes them less alert looking. Just my opinion.
Eyes: oval, bright, expression very alert
In the extended standard it states:
Eye colour is not mentioned in the Standard, however, a light eye tends to spoil the expression; it is generally accepted that a dark eye is preferrable.
Personally I can't see that a blue eye ruins an alert expression. I have not seen many adult whippets with blue eyes apart from the pics on here, but for me I can't say it makes them look less alert. It may not make them look as sweet but the standard doesn't call for a sweet expression, it calls for an alert expression.
However, the extended standard also lists harsh/staring eyes as a fault. This seems a contradiction to me when 'sweet' is not asked for in the standard wording.
I think if whilst I was judging in Australia or the UK (or any other country whose standard had the same wording) I found a dog that was extremely good in all other aspects, I would find it hard to not place it because of a blue eye alone, purely on what the standard says.
If I were judging in the US then I would have to disqualify the same dog.
Coming from a childhood in Dalmatians where a blue eye is considered a major fault - it is difficult to drag oneself away from that feeling. But I had to make myself look at the standard and then look at the dogs here with blue eyes and I really can't see that it makes them less alert looking. Just my opinion.
Last edited by a moderator: