Search results

i agree with gary, let the vote decide . it doesnt bother me whichever way it goes. but i would like to finnish by saying would the dog who broke its neck at stocton have sustained the same injury if it hadnt had a board to shove off.[i dont think so]

i just hope that when the postal vote is decided, that people are going to act like adults&abide by the decision& not say theyr not running here ¬ running there. [ this will only add to the decline in whippet racing.] everybody should abide by the democratic vote whichever way it goes.

if we had choices in everything we do [basic human rights] there would be more deaths on the roads SPEEDING, SEATBELTS etc. its just the same in whippet racing , we have got to minimise the risk of injury to our dogs by banning springboards.

i just hope that if the kickboard ban is upheld that chrissy [TOP TEN] & the fed have the decency to go with the will of the people & also ban kickboards .

the dog in question deffinately did break its neck {vets diognosis}this would not have happened without a springboard. afew year back at scotland dog had serious back inj ury due to using springboard.[dog came out of trap went about 10 yds & collapsed] its time people opened their eyes to...

i just hope that those who signed the petition &went to the EGM have wasted their time &money like those people who went to the AGM.

i very much doubt they would break their neck without a kickboard. i say ban kickboards &ban blinkers on the owners who want to keep them.

how many more dogs have to break their necks or suffer serious back injuries through the use of spring boards. use a bit of common sence and ban them once and for all.