- Messages
- 142
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Yep, as I said I want it all!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hear hear, I second that.Ms Molly said:Well said Patsy. Yes indeedy--- we all want a whippet of the correct size. But by golly it is hard enough breeding good ones, let alone get one of perfect size.We want it all!!! But alas, sometimes we have to compromise.
Who says we don't? I certainly think about it when planning a mating, alongside all the other considerations like temperament, conformation and movement and then the nitty gritty bits like mouth, ears, tails, feet, etc etcposh totty said:at what point though does the line get crossed with heights? surely we sould e trying to keep the size correct too along with other faults? :thumbsup:
simply by seeing the size rise over the years :thumbsup:dessie said:Who says we don't? I certainly think about it when planning a mating, alongside all the other considerations like temperament, conformation and movement and then the nitty gritty bits like mouth, ears, tails, feet, etc etcposh totty said:at what point though does the line get crossed with heights? surely we sould e trying to keep the size correct too along with other faults? :thumbsup:
Sorry Nicky never remember Glad with the measure, Gillian Usher had the measure on the table set at the correct height, never saw her actually use it on a dog though.UKUSA said:Returning to the size and measuring debate. Who amongst us remembers Gladys Sage who when judging would sometimes have the wicket ,set to the height in either dogs or bitches just stood on the table, I never saw her actually measure a dog. When I showed my dogs in the U.S my AM CH Fairway Riptide was measured in the ring but measured in.On the lure coursing front, I lure coursed my dogs in California and Texas and really enjoyed it and the dogs loved it.
Nicky
This little thread made me think of a photo I had come across in the past,Seraphina said:seaspot_run said:I love to watch nature shows and for my money, wolves and wild dogs have gaits that would never pass muster in any show ring. Most wolves are very east/west in front and they move with their heads lowered in a skulking manner.
If you watch wild canids trot, they don't move much like any breed standard description. This, more than anything else, shows me that most of our valuations on show ring movement are much more aesthetic than functional. :teehee:
I agree absolutely and it leaves me feeling very uneasy about what we are doing to dogs.
Somebody, often with no real understanding of anatomy, described the breeds long time ago and we go on quoting them as if that was a divine truth. So much damage has been done to so many breeds by trying to conform the dogs to various myth.
One of my dreads is judging the breed on a cold windy day, some will stand up to the conditions some will not, but it is the same for them all. We are lucky in England because we have wet weather rings, at some shows all the rings are under canvas the trouble with these is that they can be a wind tunnel even on a nice day with a bit of breeze then they would be better completely outside with the sun on their backs, compared to most countries we are very lucky in England to have this provided.jenmb116 said:I know the photos from the January circuit are no longer on the EWhippetzine, but here is the link if you haven't seen them. Lots of examples of different types and size variations in the line-ups...and alot of really cold Whippets, those show grounds are notorious for being very cold and windy, even in FL! I enjoy looking at pictures from shows, especially those that I can't go too, so I thought I'd add this link. It would be interesting to hear opinions...though having seen many of those Whippets in person, I would have to say that some are certainly not photographed to an advantage haha...still good to see anything though!
Fun In Florida
Have enjoyed this discussion so far, spent hours getting up to date..Hope to see some of you all at the Atlanta National!
Jenn
Oh I totally agree, and you can see that it only made the bad toplines worse, I was just pointing out something I had observed. I know some of the whippets pictured to have...well, closer to flat toplines, that in these pictures look very extreme.patsy said:One of my dreads is judging the breed on a cold windy day, some will stand up to the conditions some will not, but it is the same for them all. We are lucky in England because we have wet weather rings, at some shows all the rings are under canvas the trouble with these is that they can be a wind tunnel even on a nice day with a bit of breeze then they would be better completely outside with the sun on their backs, compared to most countries we are very lucky in England to have this provided.jenmb116 said:I know the photos from the January circuit are no longer on the EWhippetzine, but here is the link if you haven't seen them. Lots of examples of different types and size variations in the line-ups...and alot of really cold Whippets, those show grounds are notorious for being very cold and windy, even in FL! I enjoy looking at pictures from shows, especially those that I can't go too, so I thought I'd add this link. It would be interesting to hear opinions...though having seen many of those Whippets in person, I would have to say that some are certainly not photographed to an advantage haha...still good to see anything though!
Fun In Florida
Have enjoyed this discussion so far, spent hours getting up to date..Hope to see some of you all at the Atlanta National!
Jenn
I have seen the photo's before on Ezine and I am sure without the wind some of the toplines would not be correct.
I had 2 dogs at that show and the photographer picked the coldest, windiest day to take pictures of what was a [mostly] glorious weather 3 week show circuit. I think judging these dogs by that particular days pictures would be completely unfair and it is certainly not a true representation of overall American whippet style.jenmb116 said:It would be interesting to hear opinions...though having seen many of those Whippets in person, I would have to say that some are certainly not photographed to an advantage haha...still good to see anything though!
Fun In Florida
In America you certainly have your dogs photographed a lot more than we do. On a cold day when they are not preforming we would opt out for photo's except if you got a group placing.Scudder said:I had 2 dogs at that show and the photographer picked the coldest, windiest day to take pictures of what was a [mostly] glorious weather 3 week show circuit. I think judging these dogs by that particular days pictures would be completely unfair and it is certainly not a true representation of overall American whippet style.jenmb116 said:It would be interesting to hear opinions...though having seen many of those Whippets in person, I would have to say that some are certainly not photographed to an advantage haha...still good to see anything though!
Fun In Florida
Kristen
As I understand it, in the UK, the ringside photographers usually ask permission of the judge or exhibitors about picture taking? Correct me if I'm wrong.patsy said:In America you certainly have your dogs photographed a lot more than we do. On a cold day when they are not preforming we would opt out for photo's except if you got a group placing.
You are probaly right Patsy ( I should know better ,should nt I) maybe Gladys was stewarding for Gillian!patsy said:Sorry Nicky never remember Glad with the measure, Gillian Usher had the measure on the table set at the correct height, never saw her actually use it on a dog though.UKUSA said:Returning to the size and measuring debate. Who amongst us remembers Gladys Sage who when judging would sometimes have the wicket ,set to the height in either dogs or bitches just stood on the table, I never saw her actually measure a dog. When I showed my dogs in the U.S my AM CH Fairway Riptide was measured in the ring but measured in.On the lure coursing front, I lure coursed my dogs in California and Texas and really enjoyed it and the dogs loved it.
Nicky
When didn't Gladys steward :lol: She always made sure there no more than a hairs width between dogs whilst you were waiting in the ring.UKUSA said:You are probaly right Patsy ( I should know better ,should nt I) maybe Gladys was stewarding for Gillian!patsy said:Sorry Nicky never remember Glad with the measure, Gillian Usher had the measure on the table set at the correct height, never saw her actually use it on a dog though.UKUSA said:Returning to the size and measuring debate. Who amongst us remembers Gladys Sage who when judging would sometimes have the wicket ,set to the height in either dogs or bitches just stood on the table, I never saw her actually measure a dog. When I showed my dogs in the U.S my AM CH Fairway Riptide was measured in the ring but measured in.On the lure coursing front, I lure coursed my dogs in California and Texas and really enjoyed it and the dogs loved it.
Nicky
Nicky
That was Gillian, tracey, Shelagh measured every single whippet !!!T Hoare said:When didn't Gladys steward :lol: She always made sure there no more than a hairs width between dogs whilst you were waiting in the ring.UKUSA said:You are probaly right Patsy ( I should know better ,should nt I) maybe Gladys was stewarding for Gillian!patsy said:Sorry Nicky never remember Glad with the measure, Gillian Usher had the measure on the table set at the correct height, never saw her actually use it on a dog though.UKUSA said:Returning to the size and measuring debate. Who amongst us remembers Gladys Sage who when judging would sometimes have the wicket ,set to the height in either dogs or bitches just stood on the table, I never saw her actually measure a dog. When I showed my dogs in the U.S my AM CH Fairway Riptide was measured in the ring but measured in.On the lure coursing front, I lure coursed my dogs in California and Texas and really enjoyed it and the dogs loved it.
Nicky
Nicky
I do remember Sheleigh Thompson having the measure set ' for her own purposes' at SWKA.
She sure did, and it proved that Jester went well under the measuredolly said:That was Gillian, tracey, Shelagh measured every single whippet !!!T Hoare said:When didn't Gladys steward :lol: She always made sure there no more than a hairs width between dogs whilst you were waiting in the ring.UKUSA said:You are probaly right Patsy ( I should know better ,should nt I) maybe Gladys was stewarding for Gillian!patsy said:Sorry Nicky never remember Glad with the measure, Gillian Usher had the measure on the table set at the correct height, never saw her actually use it on a dog though.UKUSA said:Returning to the size and measuring debate. Who amongst us remembers Gladys Sage who when judging would sometimes have the wicket ,set to the height in either dogs or bitches just stood on the table, I never saw her actually measure a dog. When I showed my dogs in the U.S my AM CH Fairway Riptide was measured in the ring but measured in.On the lure coursing front, I lure coursed my dogs in California and Texas and really enjoyed it and the dogs loved it.
Nicky
Nicky
I do remember Sheleigh Thompson having the measure set ' for her own purposes' at SWKA.
Join our vibrant online community dedicated to all things canine. Whether you're a seasoned owner or new to the world of dogs, our forum is your go-to hub for sharing stories, seeking advice, and connecting with fellow dog lovers. From training tips to health concerns, we cover it all. Register now and unleash the full potential of your dog-loving experience!
Login or Register