- Messages
- 4,765
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 0
I have to say Billy, I still still stand by my original post.
As responsible dog owners we have to be able to ensure we can give our dogs the best possible treatment. If that means that we can't afford vet's bills then we need to rethink.
As a vet nurse there are many things that I have been trained to do, and would therefore carry out myself. However, I am not a vet, I did not receive the years of training, or pass exams, so if my dog had an injury that required investigation I would be straight to the vet.
R.I.C.E is applicable to many injuries, but without confirmation from a vet's exam, you can't take it as read. I speak from experience :wacko: A few years ago, I had a nasty accident where I really smacked my calf. Quite happily carrying on through the pain assuring myself I had bruised the bone, I lasted 2 weeks. Went to the hospital in the end, and found I had a fracture. My leg has never recovered from not beng cast in the first instance. Lesson learnt, and that was for myself. I can guarantee that if my dog had had an injury like this it would have been straight to the vets, regardless of cost.
I hear where you're coming from re the insurance, but you must admit, there are plenty of ways round that. Many people do not insure due to the amount of dogs that they keep, BUT they then generally have a contingency in the form of a savings account. Those that do, tend to take the stance that Kris spoke about when telling the vet exactly what the dog was doing at the time of injury.
It's of no help jumping on people who are purely concerned over the welfare of dogs. If you didn't want advice, you wouldn't have posted originally. We can't help it if you don't like what advice has been given.
I too was very concerned about the dog in your other post who had an infection, but refrained from posting as it is very difficult to put things into words. I was shocked to think that this dog had such a severe infection and had not been seen by a vet.
How is the dog today?
TCx
As responsible dog owners we have to be able to ensure we can give our dogs the best possible treatment. If that means that we can't afford vet's bills then we need to rethink.
As a vet nurse there are many things that I have been trained to do, and would therefore carry out myself. However, I am not a vet, I did not receive the years of training, or pass exams, so if my dog had an injury that required investigation I would be straight to the vet.
R.I.C.E is applicable to many injuries, but without confirmation from a vet's exam, you can't take it as read. I speak from experience :wacko: A few years ago, I had a nasty accident where I really smacked my calf. Quite happily carrying on through the pain assuring myself I had bruised the bone, I lasted 2 weeks. Went to the hospital in the end, and found I had a fracture. My leg has never recovered from not beng cast in the first instance. Lesson learnt, and that was for myself. I can guarantee that if my dog had had an injury like this it would have been straight to the vets, regardless of cost.
I hear where you're coming from re the insurance, but you must admit, there are plenty of ways round that. Many people do not insure due to the amount of dogs that they keep, BUT they then generally have a contingency in the form of a savings account. Those that do, tend to take the stance that Kris spoke about when telling the vet exactly what the dog was doing at the time of injury.
It's of no help jumping on people who are purely concerned over the welfare of dogs. If you didn't want advice, you wouldn't have posted originally. We can't help it if you don't like what advice has been given.
I too was very concerned about the dog in your other post who had an infection, but refrained from posting as it is very difficult to put things into words. I was shocked to think that this dog had such a severe infection and had not been seen by a vet.
How is the dog today?
TCx
Last edited by a moderator: