Ok just looking at this thats all
The Most Dog Friendly Community Online
Join Dog Forum to Discuss Breeds, Training, Food and More
New Bwra Ruling
- Thread starter mutley
- Start date
- Messages
- 700
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
ok so am i being a bit thick here this will affect a lot of people in the non ped world but this will now mean a lot of people not saying what the right breeding will be who was so foolish to propose this or even secound it i can see this causing so much strife well im coming back racing got me pups but might just take them lurcher racing
- Messages
- 6,933
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 0
your best bet is to get in touch with someone from the bwra im sure there must be a solution to this even if it means setting a date personaly i dont think its workable
My documents were sent away over a week ago so will soon see what the outcome is,what is supposed to happen to all these pups???I think its a case of im alright jack in other words my dogs can race and dont give a monkeys about the rest?????
- Messages
- 1,986
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 0
OY THATS WHAT IVE BEEN SAYING SINCE DEC THE 14TH LOL
NOT SO FUNNY NOW THOU IVE GOT TWO LITTERS THAT CANT BE REGISTERD
GARY
- Messages
- 10,795
- Reaction score
- 16
- Points
- 0
Can I point out that Sugar Daddy x Miss Tori pups can be registered with the BWRA, but if Miss Tori or Sugar Daddy was put back to a greyhound, the offspring would be unable to be registered under this new ruling, and I can live with that.
- Messages
- 80
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
BIG DAVES been on the phone biglandboy is only a quater ghd and bigland girl is no relation to bigland boy so any pups from biglandboy + ghd can register if you want to reply to this put your name your coment and i will pas it on.ps dont shoot the messanger 
- Messages
- 311
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
COME ON BWRA STAND UP AND BE COUNTED
AND ALL MEMBERS AS WELL
YOU KNOW THIS RULE AS IT STANDS IS WRONG
SO ALL WORK TOGETHER TO SORT IT OUT
TELL ME WHAT HAS ANY OF THESE PUPS OR BREEDERS DONE WRONG :angry: :angry: NOTHING
AND I ALSO THINK YOU ARE MAKING IT EASY FOR THE ANTI'S TO GET INVOLVED IN OUR SPORT
I AM ALSO NEW AND IF IT MENT ANY OF MY PUPS COULD NOT RACE BECAUSE OF THE NEW RULES
1,BREEDING
2, WEIGHT CAP
AND THEY WHERE BRED BEFORE THE AGM
I WOULD TAKE LEAGAL ACTION
THIS IS ONLY MY OPINION AS I HAVE NO PERSONAL AXE'S TO GRIND WITH ANYONE :wub: :wub: :wub:
RAY o o
AND ALL MEMBERS AS WELL
YOU KNOW THIS RULE AS IT STANDS IS WRONG
SO ALL WORK TOGETHER TO SORT IT OUT
TELL ME WHAT HAS ANY OF THESE PUPS OR BREEDERS DONE WRONG :angry: :angry: NOTHING
AND I ALSO THINK YOU ARE MAKING IT EASY FOR THE ANTI'S TO GET INVOLVED IN OUR SPORT
I AM ALSO NEW AND IF IT MENT ANY OF MY PUPS COULD NOT RACE BECAUSE OF THE NEW RULES
1,BREEDING
2, WEIGHT CAP
AND THEY WHERE BRED BEFORE THE AGM
I WOULD TAKE LEAGAL ACTION
THIS IS ONLY MY OPINION AS I HAVE NO PERSONAL AXE'S TO GRIND WITH ANYONE :wub: :wub: :wub:
RAY o
o
- Messages
- 6,480
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 0
How do you summise that?
The 2 half crosses can mate under the new rule, they just couldn't mate a pure greyhound.
In my opinion, the date of birth would be of relevance here. No-one could answer until the BWRA release a date as to when this rule is implicated and as a good will gesture, allow a 63 day leeway from the date of instatement.SO VICKY CAN THIS MATTING BE REGISTERD LOL
GARY
THE CAP IS NOT ENOUGH. There are thousands of greyhounds in this country weighing below 55lb. Folk can lie about the breeding!
Furthermore, the scratch classes was created to accomodate ''freak'' dogs that were over the handicap weights. These ''freaks'' were from genuine matings of small handicap weight whippets to greyhounds. As what was, should still be.
Which committee member disputed lining Midnight Run to a Greyhound? I think they've made an error here and maybe Jackie might like to contact the BWRA herself in person to clarify, although I suspect her dog would be perfectly elligable to line a greyhound.
People can state this isn't workable as many times as they like on here but there is a perfectly reasonable way to implicate breeding terms without causing upset.
Issue the 2009 rules to the public via whippet news, the BWRA website and a formal letter to all members with a 63 day leeway from it's instatement. Any bitches who have conceived on the day or before the rule has been implicated will be covered for registration. Bitches due to whelp within this 63 day period should be informed to the BWRA incase they go over their due date along with the date of conception.
In my eyes the BWRA would be immune from criticism with DEFRA because they've recognised a problem, instigated a change whilst simultaneously preventing a ''welfare issue''.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Messages
- 1,986
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 0
YES GEOFF THAT RIGHT AND THAT IS WHY IT IS SO WRONG
YOU CAN PUT A 3/4 CROSS TO A 1/2 CROSS BUT CANT PUT A 1/4 TO A GREYHOUND IT STINKS BUT THERE ARE SOME OUT THERE THAT THINK THATS OK
EXAMPLE
TWO BECOME ONE X GREYHOUND IS A NO AND WOULD CREATE MOST YARD PER POUNDERS AND SOME SCRATCH DOGS
AND
SUGAR DADDY TO MISS TORI OR MANDYS DREAM OR EVEN BAGGERA IS OK AND IS A YES BUT IN MY OPINION WOULD ONLY PRODUCE SRATCH DOGS
SET UP SPRINGS TO MIND
GARY
Last edited by a moderator:
I May not know everything there is to know about racing, rulings, and breeding, but let me just say this when you see someone put their heart and soul into something it's horrible to see it taken away this is Tina speaking not Darren and from an outside point of view who has the right to make rulings after breedings have happened long before rules came into place, as you all know we have had litters and a lot of excited owners are waiting to register their dogs, these dogs were bred for racing would you all agree that this is a huge amount of litters which will miss out of having a racing career, these decisions in my opinion should be thought out very carefully and you don't have to be a expert to realise that,it just takes a bit of COMMON SENSE and yes we shall definatley be making complaints if our dogs cannot be registered as they were born in may.
Never the less for us racing has been a social and enjoyable experience for the whole family and even though we lead very hectic lifes we enjoy what time we can when racing, I don't even know the names of the people who set these rules but may I just say that for what ever reason this may be you have definatley brought alot of anger to those who are very passionate about their dogs and racing.
The unexperienced one looking in xx
Never the less for us racing has been a social and enjoyable experience for the whole family and even though we lead very hectic lifes we enjoy what time we can when racing, I don't even know the names of the people who set these rules but may I just say that for what ever reason this may be you have definatley brought alot of anger to those who are very passionate about their dogs and racing.
The unexperienced one looking in xx
- Messages
- 700
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
well said tina , dont know whats going on but this is tearing the sport apart
- Messages
- 6,933
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 0
the CAP works on its own and no one should be told they cant regester any pups allready born it goes against promoting the sport and is probably ilegal especialy as we are still paid up members racing on last years membership
- Messages
- 1,986
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 0
I HAVE ASKED THE BWRA IF THEY HAVE ALOWED TIME FOR PUPS ALREADY BORN TO REGISTER THERE ANSWER WAS NO IT STARTED ON 14TH OF DECHow do you summise that?
The 2 half crosses can mate under the new rule, they just couldn't mate a pure greyhound.
In my opinion, the date of birth would be of relevance here. No-one could answer until the BWRA release a date as to when this rule is implicated and as a good will gesture, allow a 63 day leeway from the date of instatement.SO VICKY CAN THIS MATTING BE REGISTERD LOL
GARY
THE CAP IS NOT ENOUGH. There are thousands of greyhounds in this country weighing below 55lb. Folk can lie about the breeding!
Furthermore, the scratch classes was created to accomodate ''freak'' dogs that were over the handicap weights. These ''freaks'' were from genuine matings of small handicap weight whippets to greyhounds. As what was, should still be.
Which committee member disputed lining Midnight Run to a Greyhound? I think they've made an error here and maybe Jackie might like to contact the BWRA herself in person to clarify, although I suspect her dog would be perfectly elligable to line a greyhound.
People can state this isn't workable as many times as they like on here but there is a perfectly reasonable way to implicate breeding terms without causing upset.
Issue the 2009 rules to the public via whippet news, the BWRA website and a formal letter to all members with a 63 day leeway from it's instatement. Any bitches who have conceived on the day or before the rule has been implicated will be covered for registration. Bitches due to whelp within this 63 day period should be informed to the BWRA incase they go over their due date along with the date of conception.
In my eyes the BWRA would be immune from criticism with DEFRA because they've recognised a problem, instigated a change whilst simultaneously preventing a ''welfare issue''.
GARY
Last edited by a moderator:
- Messages
- 30
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Welcome to Dog Forum!
Join our vibrant online community dedicated to all things canine. Whether you're a seasoned owner or new to the world of dogs, our forum is your go-to hub for sharing stories, seeking advice, and connecting with fellow dog lovers. From training tips to health concerns, we cover it all. Register now and unleash the full potential of your dog-loving experience!
Login or Register