- Messages
- 868
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Nikki Whizz would have been disqualified in that case under the "rule" above. As you say Nikki Whizz ran straight and only "favours" that side and isn't a true wide runner.sherry said:so in that case when i ran my young no limit NIKKI WHIZZ @ maltby i seeded her left as that is the side she favours although she isnt severe but she does favour the left hand side anyway i got the red box nikki whizz stayed straight in line with the red box but on the ball in his 1st race on the straights went severely left so therefore ended up on nikki whizz,s left hand side on the ball wasnt seeded. so even though my dog had stayed straight in line with the red box she wud b disqualified coz a dog that wasnt seeded ended up on her left hand side? :blink:Tony Taylor said:There's a simple way of preventing owners unnessacerily seeding dogs. Disqualify any seeded dog that finishes out of posistion.ie, if a dog is seeded right hand runner on the straights and is in orange jacket but, say, the dog in the black jacket finishes on it's right hand side then disqualify the dog in orange.
True right ( or left) hand runners will always finish on their side. Owners of dogs that don't need seeding won't then seed their dogs unessacerily since they run the risk of being disqualified when a true wide runner finishes wide of it.
That's the element of risk anyone who seeds a dog would take but if you have had a true wide runner you know nothing will finish wide of them.
Nothing ever finished to the right of Red Ranger. Anyone entering a race with him in it would not seed their dog unless it was a true wide runner as well as they would almost certainly be disqualified. A true wide runner has no choice but be seeded and will run the risk of disqualification.
Last edited by a moderator: