- Messages
- 159
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Can't argue against that pragmatic attitude. That is indeed life!*Mark* said:Thats life!! you wouldn't know. You can only Judge what you have in front of you. You would not also know if a bitch was infertile or if a dog was.larruu said:Bit of an uneven playing field then - how many judges would know if a bitch was spayed unless they were told by the exhibitor*Mark* said:No a castrated dog wouldn't be placed as a judge should also be taking into consideration the ability of the dog to be able to reproduce. i.e. would bitch make a good brood bitch or a dog make a good stud. This has nothing to do with its ability to work.larruu said:Interesting - Have you ever known a castrated dog placed ? and although interesting your reply doesn't actually comment on my point re breedingT Hoare said:Not if they have been castrated for MEDICAL reasons AND have KC approvallarruu said:Whilst it is obvious that a lack of testicles precludes a whippet from the show ringWIGGLEY said:sorry i havent posted before lack of computer (w00t) what starts as a valid point from nicky about american and english show dogs now seems to have become an show verses racing debate yet again -_- also to the person who put about health problems in show dogs i have one thing to say BALLS OR LACK OF THEM in both spheres but some racing folk continue to breed from monorchids, we could not show our stud dogs without so i think you need to address your own probs before you continue to slate our show breds :rant:
it does not preclude them from racing/coursing. Furthermore although monorchid/cryptorchid animals cannot be shown, are you saying that stud dogs that sire monorchid/cryptorchids are withdrawn from breeding programmes and do you go even further and say that bitches from litters containing monorchid/cryptorchid males are not bred from either ???
Showing is not all about working ability it also about been able to reproduce the quality and continue the line.
Would you also agree however that certain show lines produce a higher incidence of monorchid / cryptorchid dogs and that this should somehow be documented in order that wouldbe breeders can avoid these lines and thus go some way to eradicating the problem .For if it is a prime requisite for a show dog to have fully descended testicles in order to be able to reproduce quality stock then shouldn't this be high on the list of breeders requirements.By the same token it is not a prime requirement for racing type breeder to have sires with fully descended testicles as they are breeding for diffirent qualities. There is of course the health issue but that would apply equally to all breeders. Thus if racing breeders are wrong to breed from unentire dogs then show breeders are equally culpable if they use suspect lines